Recap: Apple wins incomplete triumph in cycle 2 against Samsung
The jury in Apple vs. Samsung cycle 2 arrived at a verdict on Friday, keeping in mind Apple ended up a winner again in its second argument against its cell phone rival, the honor was no place close as substantial—or as definitive—as it was the last time the two organizations met in court.
What was the get worked up about, in any case?
Fruit guaranteed that Samsung encroached on five of its licenses in nine telephone models and one tablet, as IDG News Service's Martyn Williams calls attention to, and requested $2.2 billion in harms.
Samsung documented a counter-claim asserting patent encroachment on Apple's part, and looked for a $6 million grant. (Williams notes that Samsung's generally little harms case was a challenge of sorts—the organization attempted to make the point that patent encroachment claims shouldn't add up to several millions–or billions—of dollars.)
The trial took around a month, as the San Jose Mercury News brings up, and the jury pondered for four prior days concurring on a verdict.
What'd Apple receive in return?
Bulletin
Get the most recent news, drifts, applications, and tips for your Android telephone.
Get our Greenbot download bulletin
The organization won what added up to $119.6 million, a little rate of the $2.2 billion in harms it was looking for, and much littler than the $929 million it won in a prior court fight with the organization.
The moderately little honor is expected to a limited extent to the way that Apple did not win on each of its claims. As Martyn Williams calls attention to, "It was just for U.s. Patent 5,946,647, which blankets speedy connections that add logical menus to things like telephone numbers and email addresses, that it discovered all Samsung items encroached."
The jury discovered no encroachment for two of Apple's patent cases, and gave Apple a fractional triumph on its claim that Samsung damaged its patent for the "Slide to open" lock screen.
With respect to the fifth patent, the Mercury News calls attention to that a Federal Judge had formerly discovered encroachment on Samsung's part, so the jury just required to focus harms.
Samsung won something excessively, isn't that so?
Yes. The jury honored Samsung $158,400 in harmed in the wake of finding that Apple encroached a Samsung patent that identified with sorting out a synthesis of photographs and features on cell phones and tablets.
What's next?
A bid on Samsung's part, likely. The organization long ago advanced the jury's decision in the prior Apple vs. Samsung case—a bid that is even now meeting expectations its path through the courts, as the Mercury news Note.
What was the get worked up about, in any case?
Fruit guaranteed that Samsung encroached on five of its licenses in nine telephone models and one tablet, as IDG News Service's Martyn Williams calls attention to, and requested $2.2 billion in harms.
Samsung documented a counter-claim asserting patent encroachment on Apple's part, and looked for a $6 million grant. (Williams notes that Samsung's generally little harms case was a challenge of sorts—the organization attempted to make the point that patent encroachment claims shouldn't add up to several millions–or billions—of dollars.)
The trial took around a month, as the San Jose Mercury News brings up, and the jury pondered for four prior days concurring on a verdict.
What'd Apple receive in return?
Bulletin
Get the most recent news, drifts, applications, and tips for your Android telephone.
Get our Greenbot download bulletin
The organization won what added up to $119.6 million, a little rate of the $2.2 billion in harms it was looking for, and much littler than the $929 million it won in a prior court fight with the organization.
The moderately little honor is expected to a limited extent to the way that Apple did not win on each of its claims. As Martyn Williams calls attention to, "It was just for U.s. Patent 5,946,647, which blankets speedy connections that add logical menus to things like telephone numbers and email addresses, that it discovered all Samsung items encroached."
The jury discovered no encroachment for two of Apple's patent cases, and gave Apple a fractional triumph on its claim that Samsung damaged its patent for the "Slide to open" lock screen.
With respect to the fifth patent, the Mercury News calls attention to that a Federal Judge had formerly discovered encroachment on Samsung's part, so the jury just required to focus harms.
Samsung won something excessively, isn't that so?
Yes. The jury honored Samsung $158,400 in harmed in the wake of finding that Apple encroached a Samsung patent that identified with sorting out a synthesis of photographs and features on cell phones and tablets.
What's next?
A bid on Samsung's part, likely. The organization long ago advanced the jury's decision in the prior Apple vs. Samsung case—a bid that is even now meeting expectations its path through the courts, as the Mercury news Note.
No comments:
Post a Comment